A Litigation Firm for Complex, High-Stakes Disputes
Insight from both sides of the dispute.
Practice Areas
Where the Firm Concentrates
Some legal problems are straightforward. Others turn on details only sustained experience catches, and that is where this firm concentrates its practice. The selection below is a starting point, not the full range of what the firm handles.
Practice Area
Commercial Litigation
Trial-tested representation for businesses navigating contract disputes, business torts, and competitive harm.
Practice Area
Wildfire Litigation
Recovery for property owners, businesses, and insurance carriers in wildfire matters involving utility negligence and federal lands.
Practice Area
Insurance Recovery
Recovery for businesses and policyholders facing denied claims, coverage disputes, and bad-faith conduct by insurance carriers.
Practice Area
False Claims Act Litigation
Whistleblower representation in qui tam actions exposing healthcare fraud, procurement fraud, and grant fraud against the government.
Practice Area
eDiscovery
Strategic management of electronically stored information in complex litigation, including preservation, review, and production.
Credentials
Recognized Standing
A firm's standing is easiest to see in specifics: certifications held, memberships kept current, recognition earned over years of the same work. What follows below is a glance at that record, enough to get a sense of where the firm stands before reading further. It reflects one standard, held the same way in Sacramento as in Denver, Atlanta, and Austin, on the routine matter as much as the marquee one.
Services
How We Work
A practice area tells you what kind of matter this is. This is about how the firm runs it, the procedural capability that carries a matter from filing to resolution. That capability holds to one standard, whether the task is routine or central to the case, and wherever in the firm it sits. What follows is a starting point for finding the capability your matter needs, not the full range of what the firm brings.
Service
Pre-Litigation Counseling
Strategic counsel before litigation begins, covering risk assessment, evidence preservation, and positioning before formal proceedings.
Service
Discovery Strategy and Management
Comprehensive discovery management across written discovery, document production, depositions, and pre-trial preparation.
Service
Trial Advocacy
Trial advocacy across federal and state courts, including pre-trial motion practice, jury and bench trials, and post-verdict work.
Service
Appellate Practice
Appellate representation across federal and state courts of appeals, the Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Service
Mediation and Arbitration
Mediation and arbitration across pre-trial mediation, binding arbitration under major rule sets, and ADR strategy.
Service
Internal Investigations
Independent investigations of misconduct allegations within client organizations, with reporting to boards and senior management.
Service
Class Action and MDL
Class action and multi-district litigation representation across certification, MDL coordination, settlement, and appellate work.
Sectors
The Industries We Know
Some matters turn less on the type of dispute than on the business behind it, its pace, its regulatory rhythms, the pressures that occupy its leadership on any given day. Time spent inside an industry becomes a kind of shorthand, one that spares a client the work of explaining their business from scratch. What follows is a starting point, not the full range of industries where that shorthand applies.
Sector
Healthcare and Life Sciences
Complex litigation representation for hospital systems, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies, and life sciences clients.
Sector
Energy and Utilities
Litigation for utilities, energy services companies, and oil and gas operators across commercial, insurance, and regulatory disputes.
Sector
Financial Services
Litigation for banks, mortgage servicers, investment funds, and private equity sponsors across securities and fiduciary disputes.
Sector
Technology
Litigation for technology companies in commercial disputes, cross-border discovery, and electronic-evidence-intensive matters.
Sector
Manufacturing
Litigation for industrial manufacturers in supply chain disputes, trade secret matters, and product recall coverage.
Sector
Real Estate and Hospitality
Litigation representation for real estate developers, hotels and hospitality operators, restaurant groups, and commercial property owners.
Sector
Government Contractors
Litigation for federal and state contractors in False Claims Act matters, contract disputes, and parallel administrative proceedings.
Attorneys.
Depth Across Every Office
Every matter here is carried by lawyers who know the sector, the dispute, and the court. The attorneys below practice across all four offices, working to one shared standard of preparation and judgment. They represent the bench, not the whole of it.
Harvey Specter
Managing Partner
Jessica Pearson
Office Managing Partner, Atlanta
Vincent Gambini
Office Managing Partner, Austin
Marcus Cicero
Office Managing Partner, Denver
Diane Lockhart
Senior Counsel
Sandy Stern
Senior Counsel
Annalise Keating
Of Counsel
Patty Hewes
Partner; Chair, Wildfire Litigation Practice
Louis Litt
Partner; Chair, eDiscovery Litigation and Data Management Practice
Howard Hamlin
Partner
Alicia Florrick
Partner
Mickey Haller
Partner
Mike Ross
Senior Associate
Kim Wexler
Senior Associate
Lucca Quinn
Senior Associate
Cary Agos
Senior Associate
Rachel Zane
Associate
Maggie McPherson
Associate
Experience
The Matters We've Carried
The matters below reflect the range of work the firm takes on. The same discipline applies whether a matter stays quiet or draws wider attention. That record spans four offices and more than six decades of practice. What follows is representative of that work, not a prediction of how any future matter will turn out.
Secured Supreme Court Ruling Resolving Circuit Split on Coverage Trigger
appellate-ruling2026GeorgiaResolved Subrogation Claims in Northern California Wildfire MDL
settlement2026CaliforniaWon Tenth Circuit Reversal in Kansas Commercial Dispute
trial-verdict2026KansasReversed Default Termination at the Federal Circuit for Defense Supplier
appellate-ruling2026ColoradoSecured Tenth Circuit Affirmance in Government Contractor FCA Defense
trial-verdict2026ColoradoCoordinated Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire Recovery Under FEMA Framework
regulatory-approval2025New MexicoResolved Wildfire Subrogation Claims in Multi-Carrier Dispute
settlement2025ColoradoSecured Oklahoma Supreme Court Reversal in Commercial Appeal
trial-verdict2025OklahomaWon Defense Jury Verdict in Hospitality Industry Commercial Dispute
jury-verdict2025CaliforniaDefended Manufacturer Against Chapter 93A Treble Damages Claim
dismissal2025MassachusettsWon Summary Judgment in Nevada Insurance Bad Faith Action
summary-judgment2025NevadaDefeated THCLA Action Through Pre-Suit Notice Defense
dismissal2025TennesseeResolved Connecticut Consumer Protection Action Through Arbitration
arbitration-award2025ConnecticutDefended Utility Against Arizona Wildfire Liability Claims
settlement2025ArizonaWon Court of Federal Claims Bid Protest for Defense Contractor
bid-protest-decision2025District of ColumbiaWon Public Bid Protest Under Louisiana Public Bid Law
bid-protest-decision2025LouisianaDefended Manufacturer in Utah Personal Injury Action
jury-verdict2024UtahSecured Fifth Circuit Affirmance in Energy Sector Commercial Dispute
trial-verdict2024TexasDefended Insurer in Post-HB 837 Bad Faith Action
summary-judgment2024FloridaSecured Qui Tam Recovery Under New York False Claims Act
settlement2024New YorkAffirmed Defense Trial Verdict in Manufacturing Antitrust Action
trial-verdict2024CaliforniaWon Seventh Circuit Reversal in Technology Sector eDiscovery Appeal
trial-verdict2024IllinoisReversed Insurance Bad Faith Judgment Before the California Supreme Court
trial-verdict2024CaliforniaAffirmed Defense Verdict Before the Eleventh Circuit
trial-verdict2024GeorgiaWon Chapter 542A Insurance Recovery for Manufacturing Client
jury-verdict2024TexasDefeated Sanctions Motion in Complex Technology eDiscovery Dispute
dismissal2024CaliforniaSecured Second Circuit Affirmance in Financial Services Securities Action
trial-verdict2024CaliforniaWon Dismissal of Oregon FCA Action Targeting State Contractor
dismissal2024OregonSecured Dismissal of Qui Tam Healthcare FCA Action
dismissal2023CaliforniaObtained Eleventh Circuit Reversal in Real Estate Litigation
trial-verdict2023FloridaSustained Bid Protest for Defense Contractor in Eastern District of California
bid-protest-decision2023CaliforniaWon Jury Verdict in Construction Industry Commercial Dispute
jury-verdict2023Georgia
Past results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict a similar outcome in any future matter. Every engagement is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances.
Locations
Where We Practice
Where a matter sits says little about who is actually handling it. The firm draws from one bench regardless of which office a client walks into, and the same preparation and judgment apply whether the work is routine or the kind that draws attention. The offices below are where that standard currently operates.
Office
Sacramento
The firm's founding office and headquarters since 1962, located one block from the California State Capitol.
Office
Atlanta
Southeast office opened 2008 near the Georgia State Capitol, anchoring the firm's False Claims Act practice in the Eleventh Circuit.
Office
Austin
Texas office opened 2014 near the State Capitol, anchoring insurance recovery for Texas and Oklahoma severe weather events.
Office
Denver
Mountain West office opened 2019 near the Colorado State Capitol, covering wildfire litigation and Tenth Circuit federal practice.
Publications
Continuing Perspectives
What follows is one entry in an ongoing set of publication series the firm maintains. Each is organized around a recurring theme rather than a single piece. Each earns the same care as a filing prepared for one client. The firm builds these collections for the years ahead, not the news cycle in front of it.
Publication
State Procedural Updates
Cross-jurisdictional analysis of procedural and substantive framework developments across the states in which the firm practices.
Publication
False Claims Act Updates
Federal and state False Claims Act developments, including qui tam practice, public disclosure bar doctrine, and pleading specificity.
Publication
Wildfire Litigation Updates
Wildfire-related litigation, federal compensation framework developments, and utility wildfire defense across the Western United States.
Resources
Insights
A coverage dispute can turn on a single clause. A discovery order can redirect where a matter goes next. Below is a sample of what our attorneys have written on questions like these. Each piece is grounded in the sector and posture of the matter that raised it, not general commentary written after the fact.
15 featured · 19 total on the index page
Resource
Comparative Fault in 2024: Tracking State-Level Allocation Reforms
Survey of comparative fault frameworks across eight states where the firm practices, addressing pure and modified comparative jurisdictions and the structural distinctions within each category.
Resource
Federal Wildfire Compensation Frameworks: The Cerro Grande to Hermit's Peak Lineage
Federal wildfire compensation legislation from the Cerro Grande Act of 2000 to the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Act of 2022, with FEMA administration and implications for future federal frameworks.
Resource
The Public Disclosure Bar After Recent Federal Authority
Federal and state FCA public disclosure bar doctrine after the 2010 amendments, with attention to original source exception, materiality interactions, and parallel state-level frameworks.
Resource
Utility Wildfire Subrogation in the Western United States: Multi-State Defense Frameworks
Survey of utility wildfire subrogation defense frameworks across California, Colorado, Arizona, and Washington, with common operational themes and state-specific architectural variations.
Resource
Pre-Suit Notice Defense in 2024: A Five-State Comparison
A comparative survey of pre-suit notice frameworks across Arizona, Connecticut, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, with strategic implications for defense counsel handling multi-state dockets.
Resource
State FCA Frameworks Without a State FCA: Federal Enforcement in Pennsylvania and Similar Jurisdictions
Pennsylvania and a handful of other states operate without comprehensive state False Claims Acts. The single-track federal enforcement framework reshapes FCA defense practice in these jurisdictions.
Resource
Pennsylvania's Fair Share Act After a Decade: How the 60% Threshold Has Shaped Multi-Party Defense
A decade into Pennsylvania's Fair Share Act, the 60% threshold for joint and several liability has produced a defense practice that operates differently than in any other modified comparative state.
Resource
Article II After Zafirov: Building the Constitutional Defense to Qui Tam Liability
The constitutional challenge to the False Claims Act's qui tam mechanism is now before the Eleventh Circuit. A defense playbook for raising and preserving the Article II defense.
Resource
Louisiana Civilian Law: A Defense Practitioner's Primer on Delictual Liability
Louisiana operates under civilian law rather than common law. A defense practitioner's primer on Civil Code delictual liability and operational differences for out-of-state counsel.
Resource
Oklahoma's Bifurcated High Court System: Civil Appellate Practice in the Oklahoma Supreme Court
Oklahoma's bifurcated high court system divides civil and criminal jurisdiction. A defense practitioner's primer on civil appellate practice in the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
Resource
The Excessive Fines Ceiling on FCA Penalties: Litigating Proportionality After Yates, Zorn, and Taylor
Per-claim FCA penalties can dwarf actual damages. A defense framework for invoking the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause to cap disproportionate penalty exposure.
Resource
Cybersecurity Certifications as Material Terms: Defending Civil Cyber-Fraud Exposure Across the Supply Chain
DOJ now treats cybersecurity certifications as material contract terms under the False Claims Act. A defense framework for contractors and grant recipients across the supply chain.
Resource
Mallory's Long Reach: Defeating Consent-by-Registration Jurisdiction in a Multi-State Practice
Mallory revived registration-based general jurisdiction, but its scope is unsettled. A defense framework for resisting forum-shopped suits across a multi-state footprint.
Resource
The End of California's Inverse Condemnation Era? Defending Utilities Through the SB 254 Reform Window
California's strict-liability inverse condemnation doctrine is under legislative scrutiny after the SB 254 reports. How utility defendants should position cases during the reform window.
Resource
Discoverable Prompts, Discoverable Holds: Defending Corporate ESI in the Generative-AI Era
Courts are ordering production of corporate AI prompts and outputs. A defense framework for structuring AI use, legal holds, and preservation before a discovery fight begins.
Announcements
Recent Activity
Holdsworth & Inkwell's work takes many forms. Not all of it looks the same from one month to the next. What appears below is a running sample of that activity, given the same standard of attention whether it draws notice or not. It offers a sense of where the firm's attention has been, across offices and practice areas alike.
15 featured · 24 total on the index page
Announcement
Patty Hewes Named to 2025 Top Lawyers in America® for Wildfire Litigation
Patty Hewes, Chair of the Wildfire Litigation Practice at Holdsworth & Inkwell, has been named to the 2025 edition of The Top Lawyers in America® for Wildfire Litigation, recognizing her multi-state wildfire defense practice.
Announcement
Holdsworth & Inkwell Secures Oklahoma Supreme Court Reversal in Commercial Appeal
The firm secured a reversal from the Oklahoma Supreme Court in a commercial appeal, demonstrating the operational mechanics of civil appellate practice under Oklahoma's bifurcated high court system and the developed body of Oklahoma commercial law.
Announcement
Marcus Cicero to Present at HCCA 2025 Annual Compliance Institute
Marcus Cicero, Office Managing Partner of the Denver office, will present at the 2025 HCCA Annual Compliance Institute on federal and state False Claims Act developments in healthcare compliance.
Announcement
Upcoming CLE: Wildfire Litigation Defense Update 2026
Patty Hewes and Howard Hamlin will present a CLE program on utility wildfire defense developments across the Western United States and the federal compensation framework for federally caused wildfires.
Announcement
Federal FCA Pleading Specificity After Recent Authority
Federal circuit authority on Rule 9(b) pleading specificity in False Claims Act matters continues to develop. Update on the current state of authority across federal circuits and implications for defense practice.
Announcement
Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire Assistance Act FY2026 Funding Updates
The Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire Claims Office continues to administer compensation claims under FY2026 Congressional appropriations. Update on funding status, claims processing activity, and operational implications.
Announcement
Pro Bono Wildfire Recovery Initiative Reaches 100th Family Served
The firm's Pro Bono Wildfire Recovery Initiative has served its 100th family, marking eight months of legal assistance to individual claimants navigating the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon administrative claims process.
Announcement
Holdsworth & Inkwell Publishes 2024 Annual Review
The firm publishes its 2024 Annual Review, highlighting practice growth across wildfire litigation, false claims act defense, and commercial litigation, alongside recognition and outlook for the year ahead.
Announcement
Holdsworth & Inkwell Recognized in 2024 Meridian Legal Register Rankings
The firm has been recognized in the 2024 Meridian Legal Register rankings across multiple practice areas and states, with individual rankings for attorneys in commercial litigation, false claims act, and wildfire litigation.
Announcement
Firm Formally Launches Wildfire Litigation Practice with Patty Hewes as Chair
Holdsworth & Inkwell has formally launched its Wildfire Litigation Practice, consolidating the firm's multi-state wildfire defense and federal compensation work into a dedicated practice group. Patty Hewes will serve as the inaugural Chair of the new practice.
Announcement
Foundation Funding Received
Placeholder announcement to test the foundation news. Funding received!
Announcement
Firm Wins Defense Verdict in Pennsylvania Fair Share Act Multi-Defendant Trial
The firm secured a jury verdict for a manufacturer client in Pennsylvania multi-defendant litigation, with successful fault allocation below the 60% threshold under the Fair Share Act, producing several-only liability under 42 Pa.C.S. § 7102(a.1)(3)(iii).
Announcement
Holdsworth & Inkwell Secures Multi-County Defense Win in California Wildfire Subrogation
The firm secured a favorable resolution in coordinated multi-county California wildfire subrogation proceedings, defending a utility client against consolidated insurance carrier claims under the state's inverse condemnation and comparative fault frameworks.
Announcement
Holdsworth & Inkwell Launches Pro Bono Wildfire Recovery Initiative
The firm has launched a Pro Bono Wildfire Recovery Initiative to provide legal assistance to individual claimants navigating the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon Fire Assistance Act and similar federal compensation frameworks.
Announcement
Upcoming Webinar: Multi-State Pre-Suit Notice Defense
Sandy Stern and Cary Agos will host a webinar surveying pre-suit notice frameworks across five states, with strategic implications for defense counsel handling multi-state commercial litigation dockets.
About The Firm
Who We Are
Holdsworth & Inkwell holds every matter to the same standard, whether it is a routine filing or a case headed for trial. That kind of consistency is what keeps clients returning across four offices, year after year. There is more to how the firm thinks about a case, and more to the people who do the thinking, than a homepage can hold.
Why Choose Us
Why Choose Us
Every page above describes the firm from a different angle. What holds them together is a standard of care that doesn't change with the size of the matter or who's watching.
Both Sides of the Table
Most firms pick a lane and stay in it. We litigate from both sides of complex civil disputes, defending corporate and institutional clients in some matters and pursuing recovery for policyholders, relators, and property owners in others. That range is a working advantage, not a hedge. A firm that only ever defends learns one half of the board; a firm that argues both sides learns how the opposing party builds its case, prices its risk, and decides when to move. When we assess your exposure, we read it the way the other side will, because in other matters, we are the other side. Explore our @practice areas@/practice-areas@ to see where that perspective runs deepest.
Trial-Tested, Not Settlement-Default
Many firms treat trial as a failure of negotiation. We treat readiness for trial as the foundation of every strong defense. A matter that is genuinely prepared to be tried is a matter negotiated from strength, because the other side knows the threat is real. Our litigators build each case as though it will be decided by a jury, which sharpens the strategy whether the resolution ultimately comes at trial, in mediation, or on a dispositive motion. That discipline informs how we staff, how we develop the record, and how we advise you on the choices that matter. Learn how we approach @trial advocacy@/services/trial-advocacy@.
One Firm, Four Offices, One Standard
From our principal office in Sacramento to our teams in Atlanta, Denver, and Austin, Holdsworth & Inkwell operates as a single firm rather than a loose confederation of branches. A client in one region draws on the full bench of the firm, not just the attorneys nearest to them. That structure lets us assemble the right team for a matter regardless of where it sits, and it means our standards for preparation, communication, and judgment travel with the work. See our @office locations@/locations@ and the regions we serve.
Continuity from Intake to Appeal
Description: Litigation that changes hands loses memory. We build matter teams that carry a case from the first assessment through trial and, where necessary, into the appellate courts, so the strategy that shapes early decisions is the same strategy that defends them later. Our @appellate practice@/services/appellate-practice@ works alongside trial teams from the outset, framing and preserving the issues that matter before they are needed, rather than arriving after a verdict to reconstruct what was lost. That continuity protects the coherence of your defense across the full life of a dispute.
Industry-Specific Bench Strength
A defense is only as strong as its grasp of the client's world. Our attorneys bring sustained experience in the sectors where our clients operate, from energy and utilities to healthcare, financial services, government contracting, and manufacturing. That familiarity means we spend less time learning your industry on your dollar and more time applying judgment shaped by matters like yours. Browse the @industries we serve@/sectors@ to see where our experience aligns with your business.
Transparent Scoping and Staffing
Sophisticated clients deserve to know how a matter is staffed, how it is budgeted, and why. We scope engagements deliberately, communicate the reasoning behind our staffing, and keep you informed as a matter develops rather than presenting surprises at billing time. The result is a working relationship built on clarity, where you can plan around our work because you understand it. That transparency is not a courtesy we extend; it is how we think a serious defense should be run.
Depth in the Hard Cases
Some disputes are routine. The ones that bring clients to us usually are not. We have built genuine depth in the areas where the stakes and the complexity are highest, including False Claims Act and qui tam litigation, insurance coverage and recovery, catastrophic wildfire litigation, and large-scale electronic discovery. These are matters that reward sustained focus and punish improvisation, and they are where a firm built for hard problems earns its keep. Read our @insights@/resources@ for how we think about the problems at the edge of our practice.
Counsel, Not Just Litigators
The best outcome is often the dispute that never escalates. Alongside our courtroom work, we counsel clients before litigation begins, helping them assess exposure, preserve their position, and make informed decisions when a problem first surfaces. Our @pre-litigation counseling@/services/pre-litigation-counseling@ brings the same defensive judgment to the choices that precede a filing as we bring to the courtroom, because the value of a defense firm is measured as much by the disputes it helps you avoid as the ones it wins.
FAQ
Questions About the Firm
Prospective clients often carry the same handful of questions before they ever call: how the firm is structured, how it staffs a matter, what it takes to get started. The answers below address those firm-wide questions directly, the same way we would in a first conversation.
Holdsworth & Inkwell was founded in 1987 by Cornelius A. Holdsworth and Phineas E. Inkwell in Sacramento, California. The firm has practiced continuously since then, growing from a single Sacramento office into a multi-office firm with locations in Sacramento, Atlanta, Denver, and Austin. The firm was built around a defense-side commercial litigation practice and has expanded over time into insurance recovery, False Claims Act defense, wildfire litigation, and eDiscovery.
The firm represents defendants in class action litigation, multidistrict litigation (MDL), and coordinated multi-party defense matters. Class action defense work includes opposition to class certification, defense of certified classes through trial and appellate work, and resolution of multi-state class action exposure through coordinated settlements. MDL experience includes wildfire subrogation MDL matters in Northern California, FCA actions consolidated across jurisdictions, and coordinated defense of multi-claimant proceedings such as the Hermit's Peak/Calf Canyon fire recovery under the FEMA framework. The firm represents defendants in matters with significant collective exposure and supports clients in evaluating consolidation strategy across related actions.
The firm uses a combination of email, telephone, secure document portals, and scheduled video conferences depending on the matter and the client's preferences. The engagement letter specifies the primary communication channels for each matter, including any client-preferred routing for time-sensitive items. The responsible attorney maintains direct contact with the client's designated representative, and other team members communicate through that attorney or directly when authorized. For confidential or privileged content, the firm uses encrypted email and a secure document portal rather than open communication channels.
The discovery strategy and management practice provides strategic planning and execution support for discovery in commercial litigation. The practice covers preservation and litigation hold strategy, custodian identification and scoping, electronically stored information protocols and Rule 26(f) conferences, search methodology including search terms and technology-assisted review, document review workflow design, privilege protocols including FRE 502(d) clawback provisions, production format and timeline decisions, and discovery motion practice including defense of sanctions motions. The practice works in coordination with the firm's eDiscovery litigation and data management practice and supports clients across commercial litigation, FCA defense, and other litigation matters where discovery is a significant cost and strategic element.
Initial contact for a new matter typically begins with an inquiry to one of the firm's offices or directly to an attorney whose practice fits the matter. Inquiries can come through the firm's website, by email, or by telephone to the office most relevant to the matter or location. A partner or senior associate will respond, typically within one business day, to gather preliminary information about the matter and identify the appropriate attorney team. The next step is a conflict-of-interest review and an initial consultation, after which the firm and the client decide whether to proceed with formal engagement.
The firm represents clients in civil appeals across state appellate courts and federal circuit courts. Appellate work covers commercial litigation appeals, FCA defense appeals, insurance recovery appeals, eDiscovery appeals, and constitutional and statutory questions on interlocutory and dispositive review. The firm has appeared before the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, and the Second, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits, along with state supreme courts in California, Oklahoma, and other jurisdictions. The firm provides direct appellate representation as well as appellate consultation supporting trial counsel from other firms.
The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation.
Foundation
The Wayfinder Foundation
Holdsworth & Inkwell's work does not stop at the matter's close. Through the Wayfinder Foundation, the firm extends its footing in the communities it serves, a commitment built for years, not for the length of a single engagement.
Ready when you are.
Let's Start the Conversation
Most matters worth pursuing begin with a conversation long before there's a decision to make. Reach out when the time is right for you.