
Instructions
Using This Survey
This survey compares negligence allocation frameworks across the five core Southeast jurisdictions. Georgia applies modified comparative negligence with a 50 percent bar under OCGA § 51-12-33(g). Florida applies modified comparative negligence with a 51 percent bar following the 2023 amendments to Fla. Stat. § 768.81 enacted through HB 837. Alabama retains pure contributory negligence, barring recovery for any plaintiff fault contributing to the injury. South Carolina applies modified comparative negligence with a 51 percent bar. North Carolina retains pure contributory negligence with limited last-clear-chance and gross-negligence exceptions. The doctrinal divergence between contributory negligence states (AL, NC) and the comparative negligence states substantially affects venue strategy, settlement valuation, and choice-of-law analysis in multi-jurisdictional matters. Verify statutory citations and recent appellate decisions before relying on the survey in active matters.
- Format
- Size
- 225 KB
- Updated
- November 8, 2025
The information on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation.
Beyond the allocation question.
The Rest of the Matter
A negligence allocation question rarely travels alone. If this survey touches an active matter, a conversation now can help place it in context. Venue, valuation, and strategy are often still taking shape around it. For other regional materials, browse Southeast Legal Guides.